management
& marketing
Challenges for the Knowledge Society
ISSN 2069–8887
ISSN-L 1842-0206
The official journal of the
Society for Business Excellence
HOME VISION and MISSION EDITORIAL BOARD SUBMISSION GUIDELINES ARCHIVES CONTACT
- Open acces -
  Search in site
Search in
 
  Social Media
 
  Databases listing
» RePEc
        › IDEAS
        › EconPapers
  Special Issues
» International Conference on Business Excellence, 18-19 October 2013 - Volume 8, Special Issue
  Manuscript submission

Submit manuscripts to office@managementmarketing.ro
  General information

The journal is published by
Editura Economica, quaterly

Management & Marketing - guidelines for reviewers

GUIDELINES FOR REVIEWERS

Please receive the special thanks of the editorial board for your contribution to the progress and success of the Management & Marketing journal. As recognition of your voluntary professional work we will include your name in the List of reviewers published in the last issue of this journal, each year. Also, upon request, we may send to you a Letter of recognition.

1. Purpose of peer review

Peer review is a key element of scientific publishing, and it serves two purposes: (a) filtering the research, to ensure it deserves being published; (b) improving research quality, by highlighting key points and correcting errors.

2. Writing the review

You are invited to write the review paying attention to the following aspects:

  • Originality. Is the article innovative enough in its respective field of research? Is the research question an important one? Does the research design represent a new approach?
  • Structure. Is the article clearly laid out, including all the key parts (abstract, key words, introduction, methodology, results, and conclusions)?
    • Does the title clearly describe the purpose of the article?
    • Does the abstract clearly reflect the content of the article?
    • Does the introduction clearly state the problem which is investigated, and what the author wants to achieve? Does it state the hypothesis/es and summarize previous literature?
    • Does the methodology provide sufficient information as to make the research replicable? Is the design suitable for the problem investigated? Is there enough emphasis on data collection? Is the sampling appropriate? Are the results logically presented? Are statistics correct? Are analyses appropriate?
    • Do claims in the conclusions seem reasonable, and supported by results? Do authors relate to initial hypotheses and to previous research? Do conclusions explain how does the article contribute to knowledge advancement?
    • Is the language accurate and well mastered? Do illustrations in the paper clearly inform the reader, and are they consistent with the story?
  • Previous research. Does the article properly refer to previous research? Are there key references missing? Are the references accurate?
  • Ethical issues. Do you suspect plagiarism, fraud, or issues concerning the confidentiality of the research, in case it involves human subjects? Please inform the editor.

3. Communicating the review to the editor

Your final report should address the points enumerated in the previous section. Your commentary should be courteous and constructive, providing insight into deficiencies, with detailed explanations. Please, email this structured peer review to: office@managementmarketing.ro.

Journal Name

Management & Marketing

Reviewer Reference

 

Paper Title

 

Review Due

 

Please refer to the following format, and mark with an X your decision.

Please rate the following
(5 excellent, 1 poor):

5

4

3

2

1

N/A

1

Originality

 

 

 

 

 

 

2

Structure of the paper

 

 

 

 

 

 

3

Standard of English

 

 

 

 

 

 

4

Abstract content

 

 

 

 

 

 

5

Literature review

 

 

 

 

 

 

6

Research design and methodology

 

 

 

 

 

 

7

Results interpretation

 

 

 

 

 

 

8

Conclusions

 

 

 

 

 

 

Specific reviewer comments to be passed to the author/s. Please expand on any weak areas in the checklist and offer specific advice as to how the author(s) may improve the paper.

 

 

 

Should this paper be accepted for publication in Management & Marketing?

Please, mark with an X to the right of any of the following choices your final decision.

Accepted with no changes

 

Accepted with minor changes

 

Rewrite and resubmit

 

Rejected

 


 
Conferences
2012.10.12-13
[ archives ]     
Publications
The Classes of Economic Concentration and the 80% Factor , Cezar Mereuță
Foreign Majority Ownership in the Node Companies of the Main Markets in Romania - Compendium , Cezar Mereuță, Ionuț Pandelică, Amalia Pandelică
Archives
[ journals archives ]     

Home | About us | Conferences | Publications | Archives | Submission guidelines | Contact